Right?

A Treatise:

What is right anymore? It seems that what is right in todays world isn’t based on any set standard. It seems that your right may be wrong to the next person. And that seems okay and even acceptable and a likeable solution to many. After all lets just let live and let live, right?

So that begs the current question facing Texans? Is Prop 2 right for Texas? Is it in the State’s interest and the People of Texas’ interest to define marriage as “in this state consists only of the union of one man and one woman” Well, it seems we have as many answers as we have people in Texas. . . many see it from differing perspectives. Isn’t that the way of it?

So my thought begins what is it that makes right Right? Where do the boundry lines get drawn between what is simply irritating and what is criminally or morally abject filth?

What is our compass and or plumb line to discern the depths or the measuring stick to ascertain what is right in our society?

How flexible should the plumb line, compass or measuring stick be?

As I see it we have 3 choices on where we get our measuring stick:
A. Our Family, Mom, Dad, Step Parents, Grand parents, Aunts Uncles, Mom and Mom etc
B. Societies Laws: Texas and the United States have multitude thousands of laws and they have arisen from particular concerns and needs all their own along with the changing tides these have been modfied or re-interpreted through time, but they do Govern current legitimacy.
C. Our Faith.

Thoughts on each:
A. Parents and Family seem like a good start? I mean what better place to get the guidelines of Right and Wrong, after all they are the first arbitrators of such decisions?
B. Laws, well we all have to live by these so that seems like a good place to continue, I mean you gotta live within the law right? 🙂
C. Our Faith, well that seems like a reasonable thing to do your faith and beliefs must be based on something right? What does your faith teach, what are the foundation stones and principles, surely you can get good guidance here.

I think all three places are good to get your plumb line from to begin principles for living and move foward with a well balanced and meaningful life. I guess the question then becomes where does the plumb line come from that your family, our state and civil laws and our faith base the rules on?

Each one would be different? I mean surely. . . My family would depend on their parents and their faith to steer and guide them along with advice from friends and associates.

The Law is based on local and state needs along with our State and US Constitution then English Common Law and finally based upon Hammurabi and the Ten Commandments.

Faith:
The boundry line for my faith is the Word of God and the Spirit of the Living Lord guiding my heart from within.

So what does my faith, my family and civil law indicate about Prop 2 . . .Yes

Prop 2 doesn’t exist in a vacumn, it exists because things that are fundamental to the procreation of our species, and our nation are dependent upon certain fundamentals being established to protect the smallest and most innocent of new lives.

When Judges reinterpret law to grant rights and privelges never before granted, and usurp the common constrainst placed upon them by the people and the Legislature, then reactive measures must be taken, the Constitutional Amendments defining Marriage as what it already is the Union of a man and a woman for the protection and procreation of the nation and the species. This is the reaction to protect every state, which is necessary because our Constitution provides Equal Access under the law to every citizen of the United States no matter if they are from California, Washington, Texas or Massachussets. Without defining the and drafting Amendments, each State would be forced by Judicial fiat of one state to accept a new and destructive definition of marriage that is harmful and incremental to continuing the devastation and degradation of the Nuclear family.

Why didn't I see this on the News?

Whitehouse Transcript of Embryonic Baby Adoptions

I’ve recently seen a spate of editorials criticizing the President’s stand on embryonic stem cell research. This editorial charge and large scale press coverage of Sen Frist’s public endorsement of embryonic stem cell research (in opposition to his previous stand) has led to an outcry spearheaded by many who disagree with the President’s principled decision.

His decision is based on the belief that life begins at conception. . . This is not some fairy tale but scientific fact that when an egg and a sperm unite and form the beginings of life that genetically everything that will determine the physical attirbutes and makeup of the embryo are already cemented. The truth of the matter is their are hundreds if not thousands of embryo’s created in the pursuit of fertility for our nation and the worlds couples who face infertility. . . These embryo’s have no one to defend them or what they can become, they become an easy target of a quick fix and encourage a decision based upon the basis that their life is not as important as another persons life. Because of this the President has encouraged umbilical cord stem cell research, and adult stem cell research*1 which have already proven to be viable alternative to provide cures to current diseases. This fact is often ignored and bypassed. . . But our President didn’t forget.

In the initial link you will see the transcript of an event where 81 children attended. All of these were abandoned embryo’s the off shoots of infertility treatments that would have been slated for destruction or an eternal frozen sleep. . . And yet their families choose to donate and give up for adoption these small fragile lives to couples who could not have children of their own or who desired an embryo adoption. . .

So I pause to wonder, what if Embryo 81 who was adopted and born were slated to medical research instead? The life lost, the cures unfounded and the artistry and creativity missed. . .

The question isn’t what cures can be found by embryonic stem cell research or how many lives can be saved, but what is the moral cost to our society, that allows unborn children to be destroyed before they ever had a chance in the name of scientific progress? Especially when umbilical cord and adult stem cell research is already showing the promise of cures *2

As the President summarized:

” The children here today remind us that there is no such thing as a spare embryo. Every embryo is unique and genetically complete, like every other human being. And each of us started out our life this way. These lives are not raw material to be exploited, but gifts. And I commend each of the families here today for accepting the gift of these children and offering them the gift of your love. (Applause.)”

In His Service,

C

*1 http://edition.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science/03/21/australia.stemcell/
*2 http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press_releases/2005/01_19_05.html